I really like ur mentality. “MALAYsia milik Kita bersama..” i did not say MAlaysia belongs to the chinese but facts are there are proof that Hang Tuah maybe a chinese decendant.Ko baca ar betul2 dulu baru komen bukan main type jer.. Skrg sapa yg kecoh ko ke aku ? Lantak aku la nak tulis apa pun.. Dah nama blog aku.. Ko sapa nak tanya aku ? Ko takde nama pun. Daripada ko ckp benda yg bukan2 cuba ko cari bukti sebaliknya.. Takyah ckp kosong..

how despicable these malays are that to make sure they’re winning in every possible way, they are willing to even stain the history of its own people. what a fucked up people.

and people who espouse the idea of malay supremacy, let me ask you, what actually is malay? where does malay come from? parameswara? he’s no malay. aborigines? they’re no malay. so what exactly is malay?

i have also heard the same thing about the indians that it has been found somewhere at kedah, the fossils of human being which can be traced back to people in india. but the government decided to cover it up because they do not want indians to claim their rights.
kudos my fellow malaysian ! An open-minded person

Mr. Hang Melayu. Im jz too lazy to reply to this article but ur stupid comment had worked pass my ignorance and to reply to your comment. Kudos to you.
Before you start attacking me plz get your facts right. I know that you are a malay but You don’t have to get so worked up.

Read the article first. I said Hang Tuah happen to be a Chinese. I did not say tanah Melayu was owned by the chinese. Stop embarrassing Malaysians by jumping into conclusions and making yourself look like an anserine. Keep an open mind. Since u speak so highly upon Malacca I’m sure you do know that it was actually founded by a Hindu named Parameswara. Nasib baik nama dia hindu terang-terang dah tau dia tu ORG INDIA kalau tak, Im sure our well known historian will even twist the story and tell the whole world he was born malay or Islam. And The Malacca era fell after a Malay sultan became the head not during Parameswara. Now what does that say about The Sultan u speak highly upon?.
And I also happen to excel in history in school BUT I appreciate your suggestion. But on the other hand, I think you need to brush up your English before commenting on other people’s blog and attacking them.

Arab & Persian Traders before Islam have been to these parts of the world, which the Western Orientalist referred to as Nusantara and some other name, like Golden Chersonese.

Nusantara is widely regarded as a Maritime-Coastal Settlements [there is a specific term for this kind of localized authrorities].

With the coming of Islam, Muslim Traders emerged again but with a different approach. There is some amount of “missionary” work [although vastly different from Christian Evangelical Missionaries].

As Muslim Traders, they started off in Aceh the North Tips of Sumatra, into Kedah, and the Coastal Maritime settlements that can harbour boats.

Chinese traders with intermediate settlements in Indo-China were frequent visitors and exchanges took place.

It must be remembered that Muslim Traders have been to China very early during the times of Companions of Muhammad.

After sometime, the Silk Route was joined by the Sea Route and Muslim Traders became CONNECTED by way of China and Indian Ocean.

China and India represent a rather Ethnic and localized religion. Hinduism and Buddhism-Taoism-Confusianism are basically philosophical beliefs and confined largely to the specific geographical areas like India and China.

Do not confuse with their dispora, Indians and Chinese Migration which can be attributed to Western Colonization. India with British Raj and China of recent International Occupation as in Shanghai, Canton,-Hong Kong and Beijing - Opium Wars.

In any case, what is most critical is the peoples of Nusantara become the largest Muslim peoples of Non-Arab origin.

This is the crux of the matter. The Malays, Javanese, Bugis, Minangs, Banjaris, Sundanese, Rawas, Pattanis MUST shed their ethnic or racial origin and identify themselves first as Muslims.

Perhaps, to become better Muslims [including Chinese Muslims] - ie. Universal Man

Srivijaya is an old Malay kingdom and during that time their religions were Hindu. They really cruel to Javanese and when Majapahit ( javanese ) rise they attacked Srivijaya. that is the reason Parameswara ran to malacca and set up a new government. Malacca that time is still under Srivijaya territorry. Then he converted to Muslim. That is why u can see some conflict between malay n javanese today. ( Malaysia n Indonesia )

During that time there were some Malay sultanate already formed such as Terengganu, Kelantan,Kedah but they were under Siam territorry. When we talk about Melayu it is referring the people in Nusantara in Malaysia, Indonesia and Philippines. Philipino also Malay but they are not Muslim.
Please refer to http://www.wikipedia.com

yes. thank you for your insight but if u really want to know its very hard to research about the Malays even in wikipedia because its not stated very clearly other than the malays were from indonesia and not even from Tanah Melayu. The origins of malaya/ tanah melayu were the orang asli.

thx for that piece of information

think wisely my friend
choose to be right for yourself

1. To find prove and evident that show the Malays are the origins of Malaysia
and they are the first race and religion that lands their foot in Malaysia.

why should malaysian government went to all this trouble…
i choose malacca for instance, because malacca had the most riches and had international port for traders in ancient malaya land. even in history books, the first sultan of malacca is not malay, hes indonesian for crying out loud
and the first religion set in malaya archipelago according to the book was hindu

think wisely my friend
choose to be right for yourself